ABSTRACT
Background: The Coronavirus-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic increased psychosocial distress in the general population and in patients with rheumatic disease. Limited data exists on the impact of COVID-19 in rheumatology patients living in Africa. Objectives: To describe COVID-19 related illness and psychosocial impact in Ethiopian (ET) rheumatology patients attending the only public rheumatology clinic in Ethiopia (Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital (TAH) in Addis Ababa). To compare fndings in ET with fndings in Canadian (CA) rheumatology patients. Methods: Between May 1 and Oct 31 2021, 130 patients attending the TAH rheumatology clinic answered questions related to COVID-19 infection, symptoms and testing, and psychosocial impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic. We assessed depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9), anxiety (General Anxiety Disorder-7;GAD7), COVID-19 stress factors and coping measures, Resilience (Brief Resilience Scale-BRS) and medication compliance (Morisky medication adherence scale-4 item;MAS4). Rheumatic disease severity was assessed with the Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data-3 (RAPID-3). Questionnaires were translated to Amharic. Descriptive statistics are reported [mean (standard deviation), median (25%, 75%) number and percent.)] and compared to data of 97 CA patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and lupus patients from Quebec1. Results: ET patients were mainly female (71%) with a mean (SD) age of 47 (16), and resided in the capital city (Addis Ababa) (72%). Half had RA or lupus. A quarter of patients had moderate to severe rheumatic disease severity desite good medication adherence [MAS4 score of 3(2,4)]. Most (89%) reported no COVID-19 symptoms since the beginning of the pandemic, were not tested for COVID-19 and reported few risk factors for COVID-19 exposure. Eight (6%) ETs were diagnosed with COVID-19;2 required hospitalization. Diagnosed patients reported a median of 2 COVID-19 symptoms (range 0-8;mainly cough, fever and malaise). Within the entire cohort, depression (PHQ9= 10 or above) and anxiety (GAD7=10 or above) were more frequent in ETs than CAs (depression 30% vs 3%;anxiety 16% vs 1%) yet nearly half (47%) of ETs had normal or high resilience levels. The most common COVID-19 stressors were risk of contracting COVID illness personally [ETs vs CAs risk ratio(95% confdence limits-CL);0.67 (0.5, 0.99)] or of loved one [0.56 (0.36, 0.86)]. More ETs reported COVID-19 related stress related to difficulty obtaining food, medicine or other essentials [1.74, (1.00-3.0)], and getting needed supports [1.97 (1.03, 3.77)] (Table 1). CAs and ETs used similar levels of problem solving [median (25%,75%) CA 3.3 (2.8, 3.3), ET 3.5 (3.0, 3.7)] and emotion-focus [CA 2.5 (2.2, 3.1);ET 3.3 (2.8, 3.7)] coping strategies. Conclusion: During the COVID-19 pandemic, depression was more common in ETs compared to CAs with rheumatic disease. COVID-19-related stressors due to insecurity in obtaining the basic essentials and support were more pronounced in ETs. Differences between ETs and CA in these stressors may refect local public health and economic supports. There were no differences in coping strategies.
ABSTRACT
Background: Population-based data about the COVID-19 risk in patients with IMID remain scarce. Objectives: To investigate the cumulative incidence and risk factors for laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 infection and SARS-CoV2 testing in patients with IMID compared with matched non-IMID patients from the general population. Methods: A population-based, matched cohort study was conducted using health administrative data from adults living in Ontario, Canada from January to December 2020. Cohorts for each of the following IMID were assembled: rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (including lupus, systemic sclerosis, Sjogren's, inflammatory myositis), multiple sclerosis (MS), iritis, inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) and vasculitis. Each patient was matched with 5 non-IMID comparators based on age, sex, area of residence and living in long term care (LTC). Standardized cumulative rates of testing for SARS-CoV2, and for receiving a positive test between IMID and non-IMID were compared between IMID and non-IMID patients. Multivariable logistic regression analyses assessed sociodemographic factors associated with COVID-19 testing and positivity. Results: A total of 493,499 IMID patients and 2,466,946 non-IMID comparators were assessed. Significantly more IMID patients versus non-IMID were tested for SARS-CoV2 (27.4% vs. 22.7%), while the proportions of those positive for COVID-19 were identical (0.9% of all patients in both groups). Overall, IMID patients were more likely to undergo SARS-CoV2 testing (odds ratio (OR) 1.28, 95% CI 1.27, 1.29), but their overall risk of laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 was not elevated (OR 0.97 (95% CI 0.93, 1)). However, the risk of laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 infection was lower in IBD (OR 0.75), MS (OR 0.77) and psoriasis (OR 0.94) and marginally higher in RA (OR 1.07) and iritis (OR 1.13) compared with non-IMID comparators (Figure 1A). The highest standardized rates of COVID-19 infection were found in vasculitis (115 per 10,000 patients) and iritis (109 per 10,000 patients) (Figure 1B). Risk factors for COVID-19 infection included younger age, living in LTC, multimorbidity, urban living and lower income (Table 1). Conclusion: Patients across all IMID were more likely to be tested for COVID-19 versus non-IMID patients. IMID patients were not at higher risk for testing positive for COVID-19 as an overall group, yet risk varied across disease subgroups.